The four principles of autonomy, beneficence, non-maleficence, and justice are all important and interconnected in bioethics. However, there is an ongoing debate about how to balance these principles, especially when they conflict.
Autonomy, which emphasizes individual freedom and self-determination, has been criticized for sometimes being given too much weight in bioethical decision-making. This can lead to situations where personal autonomy is prioritized over other important considerations, such as social justice or protecting vulnerable populations.
Beneficence and non-maleficence are often viewed as complementary principles, emphasizing the importance of doing good and avoiding harm. Justice, which focuses on fairness and equality, is also seen as central to bioethics, especially regarding access to healthcare and medical resources (Varkey,2021).
In the Christian biblical narrative, these principles might be ordered differently depending on one’s interpretation of scripture and theological perspective. Some might argue that the focus of love, expressed in the commandment to “love your neighbor as yourself,” should be seen as the highest ethical principle. Others might emphasize the importance of stewardship or the protection of life as core values.
Ultimately, ranking these principles and their relative importance is a matter of ongoing debate and discussion in bioethics and religious ethics. Engaging in thoughtful reflection and dialogue is essential to ensure ethical decision-making is based on understanding these principles and their implications
Please reply to this DQ with 1-2 recent referecences